Fast Data Transfer

  1. Is not in the server's list of supported Location Types

    i'm using the following cmd:

    C:\FDT\FDT-Windows-Client\FastDataTransferClient.exe -n Upload -c Disk -s Disk -d c:\Temp -M 1

    Don't know what i'm doing wrong, never happen before in other machine. I changed the machine but i'm doing the same thing, what could be the problem?

    I have this problem here:

    Found 1 files in total
    [10:49:00 INF] Transferring all files in source location
    [10:49:00 INF] Adding up total size to transfer...
    [10:49:00 INF] Total size to transfer is 0 MB
    [10:49:00 INF] Session 1 of 1: Authenticated session successfully with id Pi21M
    [10:49:00 ERR] Error in session initialization: FastDataTransfer.Exceptions.SessionInitializationException: Client elected to…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Error in testing transfer

    Getting this error when doing the initial test with the client: 13:31:05 ERR] Transfer failed: System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The parameter is incorrect.

    Using the same base64 key I used to build the server. Doesn't seem to to matter if I use the base64 one or the original (though I get an error telling me to use proper base64 characters when I use the original).

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Wich protocols Fast Data Transfer use

    So.. i already have a server with fast data transfer scripts on it.
    Now i have a firewall between server and internet.
    i have a question: which ports should i open to do this successfuly? 80? 443? 445?
    Thanks.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Copy files based on a delta

    We need to copy files from a source location that are NOT IN target location (new files).
    At the end of copy file process, the file structure in target location is to be the same as source's

    is it planned out ?

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Client Doesn't seem to work on 2012R2

    [14:15:20 ERR] Error in session initialization: System.NotSupportedException: The negotiated TLS connection did not meet minimum standards

    We are using the self-signed cert

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Move SharePoint Content Databases

    Does this support movement of content databases from SharePoint on premise to Azure?

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Utilizing additional network mechanisms such as the IP protocols, and other approaches to further boost File Transfer performance

    If you are transmitting across a WAN, there are a number of WAN Acceleration/Optimization products (Such as from Riverbed, Juniper, etc.) that can do this for you on the fly - some use Molecular Sequence Reduction algorithms to identify large chunks of data that have already been transmitted and merely sends a "token" to the other side of the WAN link, instead of redundantly transmitting that same data chunk redundantly.

    In addition, some WAN acceleration/optimization algorithms perform ("spoof") the TCP three-way handshake interaction locally in order to reduce latency. This can have a greater effect than switching to a huge…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. App

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Does it do block level data transfer?

    Does it do block level data transfer? We regularly use very intermittent, low bandwidth connections so 'full file retry' will often fail. What we need is guaranteed file transfer rather than just flat out speed... maybe a feature where, if file transfer fails, revert to block transfer? That way we'd get the best of both.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Azure Data Lake

    Add support for sending data directly to Azure Data Lake

    5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. Library to integrate with third party apps?

    To be honest, haven't yet tried the FDT tool, however, very excited about it. Would the FDT tool be provided as a library for easy integration into external applications? For example, if I have a server in Azure and a client running on a user's workstation, I'd like to have the client use FDT to move files to/from the remote server.
    It's probably possible to invoke the FDT client as a separate application from within the client, but, having a library could be a more cleaner way of integration.

    Thanks.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Fix bug where progress is now shown when enumerating files from file system

    It's supposed to report progress every 2 seconds. The client does when reading from Storage, but it doesn't when reading from the file system.

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Usability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Add data compression

    (Suggestion was originally sent to the team directly, that we should move this sooner on the roadmap. Logging it here for visibility.)

    3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base